A complicated communication signal can sometimes be understood using surprisingly elementary mathematics.
Consider a large number of vectors of length 1 pointing in random directions. Add them together. What can we say about the length of the resulting vector?
This seemingly geometric probability problem leads directly to a standard mathematical model for OFDM (Orthogonal Frequency-Division Multiplexing), a technique used in modern digital communication.
The path is beautiful:
random phases → sine and cosine → Central Limit Theorem → two-dimensional Gaussian → Rayleigh distribution.
Step 1: Add Random Unit Vectors
Suppose that
are independent random angles uniformly distributed between 0 and .
The corresponding unit complex numbers are
Now add all of them:
Separating the real and imaginary parts gives
where
Step 2: What Is the Distribution of One Coordinate?
If is uniformly distributed on , then both and have density
This is sometimes called the arcsine distribution.
By symmetry,
Also,
Therefore each coordinate has mean 0 and variance .
Step 3: The Central Limit Theorem Appears
Now comes the key step.
Both and are sums of many independent random variables.
When is large, the Central Limit Theorem tells us that these sums are approximately normally distributed:
In other words, the endpoint of our random walk is approximately described by a two-dimensional Gaussian distribution centered at the origin.
Step 4: How Far Are We from the Origin?
The amplitude of the complex sum is
So we have reached a purely geometric question:
If a point has two independent Gaussian coordinates, what is the distribution of its distance from the origin?
The answer is the Rayleigh distribution.
Since each coordinate has variance , the approximate density of is
This formula is important to interpret correctly. For a finite number of random unit vectors it is generally not the exact distribution. It is the large- approximation produced by the Central Limit Theorem.
A Shorter Derivation of the Rayleigh Formula
There is also a beautiful geometric way to obtain the density.
For large , the joint density of is approximately
This density depends only on the distance from the origin.
A thin circular ring of radius and thickness has area approximately
Multiplying the two-dimensional density by this ring area gives
Therefore,
So the factor in the Rayleigh distribution has a simple geometric origin: circles become longer as their radius increases.
What Does This Have to Do with OFDM?
An OFDM time-domain sample is produced by an inverse discrete Fourier transform. It therefore involves adding many complex contributions having different phases.
This suggests viewing the sample, in a simplified model, as a sum of many complex vectors.
That brings us back to exactly the random-vector problem above.
An Example with 52 Active Carriers
Consider a system with 64 available carrier positions, of which 52 are nonzero: 48 data carriers and 4 pilot carriers.
The simple random-phasor model therefore suggests taking
For a Rayleigh distribution with the density derived above, the expected amplitude is
For , this gives
How Good Is the Approximation?
I originally investigated this question numerically by comparing the simple theoretical model with simulated OFDM signals.
The theoretical mean amplitude for the 52-vector model is approximately 6.3907.
A direct simulation of the random-vector model produced 6.3796.
The corresponding simulated OFDM mean amplitudes were:
| Model | Mean amplitude |
|---|---|
| Rayleigh theory | 6.3907 |
| Random-vector simulation | 6.3796 |
| BPSK OFDM | 6.3889 |
| QPSK OFDM | 6.4015 |
| 16QAM OFDM | 6.4058 |
| 64QAM OFDM | 6.3837 |
The agreement is remarkably good.
A complicated digital communication signal has, at least at the level of its typical amplitude, been captured by a very simple model: add 52 vectors pointing in random directions.
But What About Rare Peaks?
Matching the average is not the whole story.
For communication systems, unusually large signal peaks are important. An amplifier must be able to accommodate those peaks without severe distortion.
This is where the difference between an approximation and an exact distribution becomes important.
In the original numerical experiment, the simple theory tracked several OFDM simulations quite well at moderate thresholds. But differences appeared in the far tail of the distribution, particularly for BPSK.
For example, at a peak-to-average threshold of 12 dB, the values from that simulation were approximately
| Model | Tail probability |
|---|---|
| Simple theory | 4.0 × 10−6 |
| BPSK | 1.969 × 10−3 |
| QPSK | 9.4 × 10−5 |
| 16QAM | 7.9 × 10−5 |
| 64QAM | 4.0 × 10−5 |
This illustrates an important lesson in probability.
Two distributions can look very similar around their typical values while behaving quite differently in their extreme tails.
The Central Limit Theorem explains the center of the distribution extremely well, but rare events can require more careful analysis.
The Mathematics Behind a Communication Signal
What I like about this example is the number of mathematical ideas that meet in one problem.
We started with complex numbers:
Those became random vectors in the plane.
Their coordinates led to probability distributions.
Adding many of them brought in the Central Limit Theorem.
The resulting two-dimensional Gaussian led, through elementary geometry, to the Rayleigh distribution:
And that simple formula gives a surprisingly accurate description of the amplitude of an OFDM signal.
This is a good example of why mathematical modeling is so useful: the real system may be complicated, but sometimes the right simplified model exposes the mathematics underneath it.

Where the Gaussian Function Enters the Story
The Rayleigh distribution in OFDM is closely connected to Gaussian random variables. When many independent contributions combine, the in-phase and quadrature components of the signal are approximately Gaussian, and their magnitude produces the Rayleigh distribution.
At the heart of the Gaussian distribution is the remarkable function . Its integral over the real line cannot be evaluated by finding an ordinary elementary antiderivative. Yet there is a beautiful way to compute it by moving from one dimension to two.
Continue exploring: The Gaussian Integral and Beyond: From e^(-x²) to a Family of Integrals